Skip to content

Cloud advisory

Turn an Azure estate assessment into a prioritized technical roadmap.

We assess a defined estate against business constraints and Azure guidance, then document findings, target options, dependencies, cost assumptions, and sequenced actions.

Assessment path

Cloud advisory technical model

Inputs

  • Inventory and topology
  • Cost and usage
  • Incidents and recovery
  • Code and delivery paths
Examine
ArchitectureOperationsSecurityEconomics
Facts · constraints · assumptions

Outputs

  • Target architecture
  • Risk and exception register
  • Sequenced roadmap
  • Acceptance criteria
Reference pattern, adapted during design.
Boundary
Agreed estateSubscriptions, workloads, regions, and assessment themes are named.
Sources
Azure telemetryTool output is combined with configuration and stakeholder input.
Result
Prioritized roadmapActions include rationale, dependency, effort range, and owner role.

Assessment lenses

The assessment inspects architecture, risk, cost, and change readiness.

Automated findings are validated against workload context before recommendations are written.

01

Estate baseline

Use Azure Resource Graph and configuration exports to map subscriptions, resources, regions, tags, dependencies, and ownership gaps.

  • Azure Resource Graph
  • Azure Migrate
02

Architecture quality

Apply relevant Well-Architected Framework pillars and Azure Advisor recommendations without treating generic guidance as a workload requirement.

  • Azure Well-Architected Framework
  • Azure Advisor
03

Control and exposure

Inspect Policy assignments, exemptions, Defender for Cloud posture, identity boundaries, and management coverage.

  • Azure Policy
  • Microsoft Defender for Cloud
04

Consumption

Review Cost Management data, allocation quality, commitment coverage, and workload growth assumptions.

  • Microsoft Cost Management

Method

A bounded assessment moves from questions to sequenced action.

Scope and confidence are visible throughout the work.

  1. 01

    Frame

    Name subscriptions, workloads, business goals, stakeholder roles, themes, and date range.

  2. 02

    Collect

    Run approved queries and exports, inspect architecture materials, and interview service owners.

  3. 03

    Analyze

    Validate findings, identify dependencies and constraints, compare target options, and estimate implementation ranges.

  4. 04

    Sequence

    Group prerequisites and improvements into a roadmap with acceptance criteria and ownership roles.

Assessment boundaries

Coverage and depth are agreed before collection begins.

This prevents a discovery exercise from being mistaken for implementation or assurance.

AreaIncludedConditionalNot included by default
Azure estateNamed subscriptions and servicesSampling for very large estatesUnlisted tenants or subscriptions
WorkloadsAgreed architecture and configurationSource-code review when scopedApplication remediation or migration
SecurityConfiguration and posture observationsControl mapping when scopedPenetration testing, certification, or legal opinion
CostHistorical consumption and scenario assumptionsLicense inputs supplied by customerGuaranteed savings or licensing authority

Outputs

Assessment outputs are specific enough to fund and assign.

Formats are agreed for architecture, engineering, security, finance, and leadership audiences.

  1. 01

    Estate baseline

    Scoped inventory, topology, ownership gaps, source list, date range, and known data limitations.

  2. 02

    Findings register

    Condition, impact, affected scope, confidence, recommendation, and relevant Azure reference.

  3. 03

    Target options

    Architecture alternatives, constraints, dependencies, cost factors, risks, and preferred direction.

  4. 04

    Sequenced roadmap

    Prerequisites, work items, effort ranges, owner roles, acceptance criteria, and unresolved assumptions.

Commercial fit

Use advisory when the question and estate boundary can be named.

Implementation can follow under a separate scope after findings are accepted.

Questions to answer before scoping

  1. Which subscriptions and workloads are in scope?
  2. Which findings must be implementation-ready?
  3. What source limitations should be declared?
Bring us the current estate

Best suited to

  • Cloud strategy refreshes
  • Pre-migration baselines
  • Landing-zone or governance health checks

Needed to begin

  • Read access approved for the named scope
  • Architecture, cost, and service contacts available

Customer responsibilities

  • Validate inventory and business criticality
  • Supply licensing and contract assumptions

Not included by default

  • Implementation, remediation, or production change
  • Certification, legal advice, penetration testing, or managed SOC